Happy Canada Day. I wrote this for a some anarchist rag back in July of 1995. The freedom to gripe is dear to me and my great country still lets me do it despite its many stupid-ass faults. It’s a pretty rare article, but a bit prescient, given the state of things. It put a grin on my face and I hope it will amuse you too.
Today I watched my television.
In addition to destroying my eyesight and my mental capacity, I felt it destroy my long-time hope to see the end of silly government and stupid legislation. I am talking, of course, about the proposal to extend the mandatory bicycle helmet law to adults.
I can’t possibly comprehend why anyone would think it necessary to make it illegal for an adult riding a bike to not have a helmet. I suppose I had been erroneously under the impression that bicycles were fairly safe once you had figured them out. Child helmets I can understand — kids are clumsy and they fall over all the time — but certainly Canadian adults aren’t that bad at operating bicycles.
I’ve ridden a bicycle for years and I’ve never hit my head. I’ve bumped my head many times while walking, however; I’ve been walking on my feet for longer than I’ve been riding a bike and I am definitely sure that on a per day basis, I hurt myself more often while walking. In fact, I’ve done it all when it comes to head bashing: patio doors, windows, bunk-beds, barbecues, parking lots, people, car doors, fences, beams, headboards, door-frames, cows, etc, etc… I hit my head a lot, actually. It’s surprising I even remember the barest amount English.
I don’t consider myself to be anything but average in terms of head-bumping, so whether you want to admit it or not, I’m sure that you too have bumped your head many times while doing things besides bicycling. I figure that the average Canadian hits his noggin hard at least twelve times every year. This means that you can expect to hit your head about one thousand times during your lifetime. I’m willing to bet that none of these times are while riding your bicycle. Considering the number of times people do hit their heads, it’s surprising that someone isn’t trying to make it law to always wear a helmet, no matter what you are doing.
Not wearing a helmet doesn’t have the potential to hurt anyone else (in fact, you would think that crashing in to someone while wearing a hard plastic helmet would hurt more), so the only reason for wearing one is personal safety. But even if you were wearing a helmet while riding a bicycle, would that really prevent you from receiving bodily harm? This is very closely tied to the whole motorcycle helmet law argument, and it goes something like this: Sure, the number of fatal skull impacts goes down, but the number of quadriplegic bikers goes up. Imagine, because of your helmet, your brain gets to stay alive and enjoy your ruined body for the rest of your life. I would rather be dead, thank you.
This is not to say that helmets are a bad idea. If I was a road race cyclist, I’d probably wear a helmet. If I was keen on cycling down mountains, I’d probably wear a helmet. In fact, there are a lot of things I’d wear a helmet for, including mountain climbing, football, boxing and walking around in Toronto. But I have trouble understanding why I might need a helmet to bike to the corner store.
If bumping you head is something you worry about then fine, wear a helmet, because the choice is yours. It is also your choice to eat onion rings, play Nintendo, read Daniel Steele novels or clean your ears with Q-tips. All of these things are probably dangerous for your health too, but you aren’t likely to see black on white on a box of Q-Tips telling you that “Swabbing your ears with this product may cause hearing loss”.
Personal safety isn’t exactly something that you need the government to help you with anyway. It’s even a bit insulting for the government to pass such a law. It implies that they know more about your personal safety than you do. I know politicians. They’re not any more knowledgeable about statistics or our health care system than you are. Since few studies have actually been done on helmets in regards to bicycle fatalities, I know that they don’t have any more data on the subject either. Besides, bumping your head is a very personal thing — it’s none of the government’s business and they know it. The couldn’t possibly have your safety in mind when passing such laws. But they may have considered the following:
- Potential loss of tax revenue. If you die you can’t pay taxes. It’s in the government’s best interest to keep you living.
- Reduced medical expenses. Certain people actually believe that bicycle helmets will notably reduce government Medicare expenses. This is like saying that shaving your head noticeably reduces Athlete’s Foot. Still, the government may have believed these people. Personally, I believe that it actually increases extended Medicare expenses because it saves lives. Remember, the state pays for your hospital bill, not your funeral expenses.
- Legislation. It is also in the government’s interest to pass laws and policy. That way they can’t be accused of jerking around and wasting the taxpayers’ money, even if they really are.
- Legal Revenues. The fine for not wearing your helmet in British Columbia is one hundred bucks. In the first couple years, before cyclists take the law seriously, the government could stand to make a whole lot of money in fines.
- Jobs equals economy equals more tax revenue. If the government passes a federal mandatory helmet law, Canada’s twenty million or so cyclists are all going to need helmets. A previously boutique industry will explode overnight creating jobs, a stronger economy and subsequently, more government tax revenue. Assuming an average price of thirty dollars per helmet, the industry will experience about six hundred million dollars of growth. In GST, that gives the government about forty-two million; in manufacturer’s taxes, probably about fifty million; in corporate and personal capital taxes, about one hundred million. As a happy coincidence, the government will also get closer to it’s job creation goals.
- Control. Can’t have the people having any fun, can we? That just wouldn’t do. If one person bumps their head, obviously the entire sport will be ruined for the rest of us. So now, if someone hurts himself while riding without a helmet, the police can have him summarily charged, to remind him of his disobedience.
If the government figures that riding bicycles is so damn dangerous, why aren’t they making bungee jumping, hangliding and driving our highways illegal? Watch the local news some night. At least three of the stories are about fatal car-accidents. How many are about fatal bicycle accidents? The national number of fatal bicycle accidents hovers around 75 per year. This means that you have a 0.0003 per cent chance yearly of killing yourself while bicycling. Your chances of dying in a car-accident: 0.01 per cent. Your chances of getting shot in the United States: 0.1 percent.
In the government’s never-ending strive to control the lives of Canadians, I believe they have reached new lows of Big Brother control. I think, and I’m probably not the only one, that their control ends the moment you no longer endanger society. Who cares if a few people every year kill themselves while riding bicycles? Obviously riding bicycles is SO dangerous that it would be insensitive of the government to do nothing. What a pile of goat-load.
So let’s see this for what it really is: a cash grab, a control attempt, bogus legislation from a BS level running deep. Public safety is not the real issue here, because the public aren’t in danger from hitting their heads while bicycling. You’re not. You are in more danger from a government that wants to over-legislate every personal facet of your life. Tell ‘em where you draw the line.